Friday, May 27, 2022
HomeArchivesEditorial endorsing a vote of NO on the new ASCOCC constitution raises...

Editorial endorsing a vote of NO on the new ASCOCC constitution raises concern (letters to the editor)

Unethical tactics

The question I want to see inves­tigated is the e-mail “blast” sent by Brenda Pierce on Saturday May 8th 2010 at 7:00PM. She seems like a qualified candidate but I feel her use of ASCOCC resources to campaign may be unethical. The white house staff cannot legally use the peoples re­sources for political gain, and I feel it is discouraging of student body partici­pation for the marketing coordinator of ASCOCC to campaign for a position using the “offices” resources. One of your points against the new constitu­tion is term limits, and this case is just another example of a grab and hold on power. Using our resources against her opponents is fine until you realize that her opponents by definition has to be ONE OF US!!

Jeffery Jensen

A differing view

Hi Jeffrey,

Thank you for your comment about this and bringing it to the attention of The Broadside so I have the opportu­nity to respond. No, I did not use any ASCOCC resources to send out an email. I did not use any “lists” from anything that I may have access to that a typical student would not have equal access to. I did not use the “of­fices” resources. I know better than to do that.

However, college faculty and staff have used those resources you speak of to promote specific candidates in this election. I think there is a huge difference when I as a student ask for another students vote compared to a faculty or staff member who uses their email lists of students in their classes (or employees) to campaign for specific students. I as a student am not in a position of coercion (I do not grade those students or employ them).

Thanks again for the opportunity for clarification.

Brenda Pierce



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Other Articles